){kind=logo}
IT Administrators managing Chrome updates in 2025 face ongoing challenges with heap buffer overflow vulnerabilities. Recent issues related to WebRTC, V8 JavaScript engine, and media components in Google Chrome have kept IT teams busy trying to stay on top of securing their highest-risk, and frequently used, applications.
Summary: Heap buffer overflow vulnerabilities occur when software writes data beyond allocated memory boundaries in the heap, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code or crash systems. These vulnerabilities are particularly dangerous in widely-deployed software like browsers and operating systems. Organizations can mitigate heap buffer overflows through regular patching, memory debugging tools, and address randomization techniques like ASLR.
If Google Chrome or Chromium-based web browsers are part of your endpoint infrastructure, understanding how heap buffer overflow vulnerabilities work and how to actively plan for mitigating these overflow occurrences is essential.
What is a heap buffer overflow vulnerability?
Heap is a section of memory that stores dynamic variables. Consider the memory available for your software development needs as a pool or "heap" of memory segments. Modern software systems dynamically allocate, manage, and release data and variables by pointing to and using a finite amount of these memory segments.
There might occur instances when the inputs passed using these software elements might be too large and run over these finitely assigned memory blocks. These oversized inputs can "overflow" into adjacent memory blocks, inadvertently accessing the information in those segments.
Attackers looking to access critical data in these segments can take control of this heap overflow vulnerability and allow it to be turned into arbitrary code execution. For example, they might trick a user into visiting a specially crafted HTML page in Chrome. These bad actors can use heap-based overflows to overwrite pointers or object metadata that may be living in memory, pointing it to the attacker's code.
While you may argue that most modern software programming languages can abstract and manage memory allocation efficiently, the runtime environments for some languages might be on a low-level programming language like C. This can potentially leave the door open for inefficient heap management.
Heap buffer overflow is a specific type of memory corruption vulnerability that targets dynamically allocated memory regions rather than the stack.
How does heap buffer overflow differ from stack buffer overflow?
| Characteristic | Heap Buffer Overflow | Stack Buffer Overflow |
|---|---|---|
| Memory location | Dynamically allocated memory region | Fixed-size memory for function calls |
| Allocation timing | Runtime allocation | Compile-time allocation |
| Exploit complexity | Higher complexity to exploit | Lower complexity to exploit |
| Detection difficulty | More difficult to detect | Easier to detect with stack canaries |
| Memory size | Larger, flexible size | Smaller, fixed size |
| Common targets | Object metadata, function pointers | Return addresses, saved registers |
| Protection mechanisms | ASLR, heap randomization | Stack canaries, ASLR, DEP |
| Persistence | Can persist across function calls | Limited to function scope |
What is the impact of a heap buffer overflow vulnerability?
Heap buffer overflows can commonly occur in large software development cycles if thorough testing of user inputs without sufficient validation does not take place.
Such overflow vulnerability occurrences might look similar to stack-based buffer overflows, except that finding and triggering heap buffer overflows require much more diligence in understanding memory allocation patterns in a code base. With enough skill, hackers can gain access and execute custom code, giving them access to any process running on that endpoint.
Since such overflows can go undetected, especially in OS-level implementations (like iOS or Windows) or large software (like Google Chrome), exploiting a vulnerability such as this can give attackers a massive global-level attack surface to impact millions of endpoints.
So how can your IT team thwart such attacks and shield your endpoints? Use the following best practices as a starting point to circumvent heap buffer overflow attacks.
What are best practices to mitigate heap buffer overflow vulnerabilities?
1. Deploy strong security controls
Your team might be unable to completely stop bad actors from attacking your IT infrastructure. You can hold them back by deploying strong access policies and multi-factor authentication to discourage their efforts in finding a way into your organization's environment.
2. Enforce stringent testing practices
Testing complex software systems like browser updates can be overwhelming. Deploying a mix of excellent heap memory debugging tools (like GNU libc) and a comprehensive set of development standards for sanity checks and address randomization (like ASLR) can set your development teams up for securing their code from heap buffer overflows.
3. Patch quickly and patch often
The best way to stay ahead of attackers looking to exploit heap buffer overflow vulnerabilities is to ensure the latest patches are deployed as they become available. If you have a large endpoint footprint, automating the patching and updating process can save your IT team time, resources, and effort in ensuring that your IT infrastructure gets a fighting chance to stay on top of such vulnerabilities.
For browsers specifically, keeping Chrome and other Chromium-based browsers updated is critical since they are frequent targets for zero-day vulnerabilities. Automox makes it easy to keep browsers updated across your entire endpoint fleet.
4. Use memory-safe programming practices
When developing or reviewing code, prioritize memory-safe programming languages where possible. For legacy C and C++ codebases, implement bounds checking, use safe string functions, and enable compiler security flags that detect buffer overflows.
5. Implement runtime protections
Enable operating system and compiler-level protections such as Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR), Data Execution Prevention (DEP), and heap metadata protection. These measures make exploitation significantly more difficult even when vulnerabilities exist.
How can you detect heap buffer overflow vulnerabilities?
Organizations should implement multiple detection methods to identify heap buffer overflow vulnerabilities before attackers exploit them:
Static code analysis - Use automated tools to scan source code for potential buffer overflow patterns
Dynamic analysis - Run applications with memory sanitizers that detect overflows during execution
Fuzzing - Test applications with malformed inputs to trigger unexpected buffer conditions
Penetration testing - Conduct regular security assessments focused on memory corruption vulnerabilities
Vulnerability scanning - Monitor for known CVEs affecting your software stack
Fighting back against heap overflow vulnerabilities
Heap buffer overflows might refuse to go away entirely as organizations continue to use more complex software systems in the future. While you cannot stop enabling your business to innovate and use these software systems, you can equip your IT teams with comprehensive endpoint management automation and good development practices.
Frequently asked questions
Heap buffer overflows require attackers to understand the specific memory layout and allocation patterns of the target application. Unlike stack overflows where the return address is at a predictable location, heap exploitation requires manipulating object metadata or function pointers scattered throughout memory. Modern heap implementations also include randomization and integrity checks that complicate exploitation attempts.
C and C++ are the most vulnerable languages because they allow direct memory manipulation without built-in bounds checking. Languages like Rust, Go, and modern versions of Java and Python manage memory automatically, significantly reducing heap overflow risks. When these memory-safe languages call into C libraries, the vulnerability risk can still exist at the interface boundary.
Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) randomizes the memory addresses where the heap, stack, and libraries are loaded each time an application runs. This prevents attackers from reliably predicting where their exploit code or target data will be located in memory. Even if an attacker can trigger a heap overflow, ASLR makes it much harder to redirect execution to malicious code.
Traditional signature-based antivirus has limited effectiveness against heap buffer overflow exploits because each attack can be unique. Behavior-based endpoint protection and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions can detect suspicious memory access patterns that indicate exploitation attempts. These tools work best when combined with regular patching to eliminate known vulnerabilities entirely.
Heap buffer overflow vulnerabilities are discovered regularly in widely-used software. In 2025, Google Chrome alone patched over a dozen heap-related vulnerabilities across quarterly security updates. Microsoft, Apple, and Linux distributions also release regular patches for heap overflow issues. This frequency underscores the importance of automated patching solutions that can deploy updates quickly across all endpoints. For related vulnerability definitions, see the Automox guides on use-after-free vulnerabilities and remote code execution.
)
)
)
)